Short answer: SGX coverage on Simply Wall St looks solid for the STI and for small caps that have a few brokers following them, but I could not prove it has improved since my 11 September review.

The Snowflake Score is still a quick, visual first read, not a verdict. Check the "last updated" stamp on every company page before you lean on it.

In my 30 October 2026 check, the Singapore screener returned 550 results across SGX and Catalist, and a small cap like Pan-United (SGX: P52) came with a full valuation page built on 5 analyst estimates.

That is better than "thin", but one thing tempered my enthusiasm: some pages I opened showed analysis dates from 2025.

This is the third time I am looking at the platform. For the original walkthrough, read my Simply Wall St review for Singapore investors. For income tracking, see my dividend tracker test. This post asks one narrow question: is SGX coverage deeper now?

The Snowflake Score rates a company on five arms, each out of six: valuation, future growth, past performance, financial health and dividend.

A full six-point chart is rare, and a lopsided one tells you where to dig deeper.

It is a mechanical read of the numbers. It does not judge management quality, a widening moat or how reliable an order book is. That is why I pair it with frameworks like VCBM for small caps and the 5M checklist for larger names.

My September review said coverage was fine for STI constituents, most REITs and a fair chunk of small and mid caps, but thinner on less liquid Catalist counters, where analyst estimates and community fair value inputs drop off. I also said I had not tested every counter.

So for this revisit, I tested three different layers of the market: the large-cap banks, a small cap, and the broad screener.

The Pan-United page is the useful data point. It shows a small cap with a proper valuation score, a DCF fair value of S$3.12 against a S$1.60 price, and analyst targets from S$1.42 to S$1.88.

The page also flags the stock as expensive on a P/E basis against peers. Two different yardsticks, two different stories, which is exactly why I do not treat any single score as the answer.

My honest read: I cannot say yes with evidence. I did not record a company count in September, so I have no baseline to compare 550 against. What I can say is that the small cap I tested was well covered, which is at least consistent with "not thin".

Here is the catch. Two pages I opened for large caps looked stale. The Singapore Exchange (SGX: S68) page showed analysis last updated on 29 January 2025 at a S$12.23 share price, and the DBS page showed analysis from 15 March 2025 at S$44.25, far below the S$73.80 in the screener. That could be a cached copy on my side rather than the live site, so I would not call it a platform fault. But it is a reminder to check the date stamp yourself.

Simply Wall St has three plans: Free, Premium and Unlimited. The plans page says new accounts get 7 days of Premium with no credit card, then move to Free unless you pick a plan. I could not confirm current prices from the plans page, so check the Simply Wall St pricing page before you decide.

The practical point for SGX investors: the Free screener shows only the top 4 results, so the 550-name universe is mostly behind a paid plan. Some feature rows on the plans page were blank, so confirm what each tier includes before you commit.

Disclosure: this is an affiliate link, so InvestKaki may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you.

Personally, I think it suits investors who want a fast first filter across SGX and global stocks before doing deeper work. It fits less well if you only follow three or four blue chips, where the free SGX StockFacts page and company reports already do the job. For the shortlist stage, my guide to the best SGX dividend stocks for 2026 is a good companion.

I pull my favourite tools together in the free Your Ultimate Guide to Investing Tools ebook, which you can get here.

Does Simply Wall St cover SGX stocks? Yes. The Singapore screener showed 550 results across SGX and Catalist when I checked, and STI names and a small cap I tested all had full pages.

Is the Snowflake Score reliable for small caps? It is a useful first read, but small caps may rest on only a handful of analyst estimates. Pan-United's page used 5. Check the number of analysts.

Is Simply Wall St free? There is a Free plan with limits (5 reports a month, top 4 screener results), plus a 7 day Premium trial for new accounts with no credit card.

How is it different from SGX StockFacts? StockFacts is free and gives official SGX data. Simply Wall St adds the scoring and cross-market comparison layer.

Should I rely on the score to make decisions? No. Treat it as a screening tool and do your own checks. This is educational content, not financial advice.